Sunday, May 27, 2012

Lecture 11


Week 11. Investigate Journalism

Before exploring the subject of investigate journalism, one must question; isn’t all journalism investigative?

Quoted from the Journalism Fund.
“In the view of Journalismfund.eu there is no final definition of investigative journalism. On the contrary – it should be a vivid process to strive for investigative journalism and any definition must be scrutinised over and over in an ongoing debate among journalists. However we would like to contribute to this debate by adding some crucial points from several parts of Europe.
“Investigative journalism is critical and thorough journalism,” according to the definition of the Dutch association for Investigative Journalism, VVOJ.
Critical means that journalism is not merely passing on ‘news’ that already exist. It implies news, which would not be available without any journalistic intervention. This can be done by creating new facts, but also through re-interpretation or correlation of facts already at hand. Thorough means that one makes an own substantial effort, either in quantitative terms – much time spent in research, many sources consulted, etc. - in qualitative terms - sharp questions formulated, new approaches used, etc., or a combination of both.
Based on this definition we discern three types of investigative journalism. Incidentally these categories might overlap.
  • Uncover scandals. Aimed at detecting violations of laws, rules or norms of decency, by organisations or individuals.
  • Review of policies or functioning of government, businesses and other organisations.
  • Draw attention to social, economic, political and cultural trends. Aimed at detecting changes in society. 
The leader of Swedish TVs investigative magazine Uppdrag Granskning, Nils Hanson, has the following definitions on investigative journalism published in his book Grävande Journalistik from 2009:
  • Critical approach - focus is on what does not work and in one way or another can be described as anomaly. 
  • Important subject - only a question of importance for the common good can motivate the amount of effort and resources, that very well may have to be invested in the research as well as the criticism uttered in the publication. 
  • Own initiative - journalists/editors decide, what is important. 
  • Own research - the reporter gathers information and documents, sometimes in spite of tough resistance. 
  • Own analysis - the information gathered and the documents are evaluated. An expert can assist in the analysis, but publication does not depend on what someone says. 
  • Exclusivity - the public learns important information, that else would not have been in the open.
According to the Center for Investigative Journalism at London City University, ”UK and US colleagues tend to define IJ in its moral and ethical purpose and obligation, rather than as a slightly more serious version of ordinary news reporting. “In the service of the Public Interest, our purpose is to uncover corruption, injustice, maladministration and lies.  As a duty to readers and viewers as well as self-protection in a hostile legal environment, investigative journalism seeks above all to tell the documented truth in depth and without fear or favour. It is to provide a voice for those without one and to hold the powerful to account. It's to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. 
Is it critical and thorough?  Yes, but investigative journalism is skeptical and keen to bring information that someone wants to be keep secret, into the public light.
Sheila Coronel from the Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism at Columbia University in New York in her book Digging Depper from 2009 has five definitions of, what investigative journalism is NOT, and three of what it is:
Investigative journalism IS NOT:
  • Daily reporting
  • Leak journalism
  • Single source reporting
  • Misuse of information
  • Paparazzi journalism
Investigative journalism IS:
  • Watchdog journalism
  • Exposing how laws and regulations are violated
  • Holding the powerful accountable.”

The In’s on Investigate Journalism
Intelligent
Informed
Intuitive
Inside information
Intimate
Invest (time, money, and yourself)

Investigative Journalism is seen to have a deeper meaning and purpose. As a journalist, one is a custodian of conscience. This means that journalism provides a ’civic vice’ for citizens to respond. Most importantly, investigative journalism intends to provide a voice for those without one. It has the ability to hold the powerful, accountable, and must seek to provide social justice. In this light, journalism is a very respectable career. 


Historical trailblazers for investigative journalism include Moonlight State led by Chris Master. Masters’ investigated police corruption in Queensland, and even inspired a judicial inquiry the day after the broadcast. Moonlight State is an example of civic duty at its best. The broadcast is available to watch here


No comments:

Post a Comment