Week 11. Investigate Journalism
Before exploring the subject of investigate
journalism, one must question; isn’t all journalism investigative?
Quoted from the Journalism Fund.
“In the view of Journalismfund.eu there is no final definition of
investigative journalism. On the contrary – it should be a vivid process to
strive for investigative journalism and any definition must be scrutinised over
and over in an ongoing debate among journalists. However we would like to
contribute to this debate by adding some crucial points from several parts of
Europe.
“Investigative journalism is critical and thorough journalism,”
according to the definition of the Dutch
association for Investigative Journalism, VVOJ.
Critical means
that journalism is not merely passing on ‘news’ that already exist. It implies
news, which would not be available without any journalistic intervention. This
can be done by creating new facts, but also through re-interpretation or
correlation of facts already at hand. Thorough means that one
makes an own substantial effort, either in quantitative terms – much time spent
in research, many sources consulted, etc. - in qualitative terms - sharp
questions formulated, new approaches used, etc., or a combination of both.
Based on this definition we discern three types of investigative
journalism. Incidentally these categories might overlap.
- Uncover scandals. Aimed at detecting violations of laws, rules or norms of decency, by organisations or individuals.
- Review of policies or functioning of government, businesses and other organisations.
- Draw attention to social, economic, political and cultural trends. Aimed at detecting changes in society.
- Critical approach - focus is on what does not work and in one way or another can be described as anomaly.
- Important subject - only a question of importance for the common good can motivate the amount of effort and resources, that very well may have to be invested in the research as well as the criticism uttered in the publication.
- Own initiative - journalists/editors decide, what is important.
- Own research - the reporter gathers information and documents, sometimes in spite of tough resistance.
- Own analysis - the information gathered and the documents are evaluated. An expert can assist in the analysis, but publication does not depend on what someone says.
- Exclusivity - the public learns important information, that else would not have been in the open.
Is it critical and thorough? Yes, but investigative journalism is
skeptical and keen to bring information that someone wants to be keep secret,
into the public light.
Sheila Coronel from
the Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism at Columbia University in New
York in her book Digging Depper from 2009 has five definitions of, what
investigative journalism is NOT, and three of what it is:
Investigative journalism IS NOT:
- Daily reporting
- Leak journalism
- Single source reporting
- Misuse of information
- Paparazzi journalism
- Watchdog journalism
- Exposing how laws and regulations are violated
- Holding the powerful accountable.”
The In’s on Investigate Journalism
Intelligent
Informed
Intuitive
Inside information
Intimate
Invest (time, money, and yourself)
Investigative Journalism is seen to have a
deeper meaning and purpose. As a journalist, one is a custodian of conscience.
This means that journalism provides a ’civic vice’ for citizens to respond.
Most importantly, investigative journalism intends to provide a voice for those
without one. It has the ability to hold the powerful, accountable, and must
seek to provide social justice. In this light, journalism is a very respectable
career.
Historical trailblazers for investigative journalism
include Moonlight State led by Chris Master. Masters’ investigated police corruption in Queensland, and
even inspired a judicial inquiry the day after the broadcast. Moonlight State
is an example of civic duty at its best. The broadcast is available to watch here.
No comments:
Post a Comment